Immigration Policy and Politics: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
In April the state of Arizona enacted a now famous statute that would make it a crime for immigrants not to carry immigration documents.  Under the new law police have the authority to check for such papers if an officer stops someone for any reason, such as a traffic violation or even just suspicious behavior. Opponents of the law say it’s an invitation to harassment of Latinos and ethnic profiling , which it probably is.
The Obama Administration has taken the extraordinary step of challenging the new law in court. The Justice Department is charging that the Arizona law usurps federal authority to control immigration. There is no little irony here, since – with 12 million or so illegals living in the United States – the federal government is clearly not controlling immigration.  Arizonans and other citizens of border states are increasingly the victims of violent drug gangs and immigrant smuggling cartels. Border state police and social services are strained to the breaking point. Does the federal government have the right not to control our borders and keep the states from doing so as well?
Since Washington is not doing its job to secure the borders, shouldn’t it be the states that are suing the federal government, and not the reverse?
The Administration’s lawsuit seems as much about politics as it is about policy. The US Senate this spring suddenly shifted its priorities away from a climate and energy bill to immigration when Democrats decided that they might mobilize Latinos in fall elections against the Republicans. The New York Times reported that White House officials said the President was not involved in the Justice Department’s decision to sue Arizona. Uh huh. The White House must think voters are pretty dumb. They obviously want the Latino vote but don’t want native whites in border states to be too angry with the President. If only this were about good policy rather than good politics.
The ugliest stuff on immigration, however, comes from the xenophobic Right, who are quick to place blame for immigration-related problems on poor and desperate Mexicans rather than on the native-born US businesses that hire them for low wages. Most illegals – hard working and decent – would arguably make better citizens than their heartless accusers. On various conservative websites it is not uncommon to see postings suggesting that illegal immigrants should be shot at the border.  An overabundance of the Spanish language and Latino culture seems enough to set many people off into nativist conniptions. They’ve forgotten – if they ever knew – thatmmigration has historically strengthened the United States. Current waves of Mexicans and other Spanish-speaking peoples, if properly regulated, are no different.
In some ways the immigration policies of the Obama Administration are an improvement over thos of its predecessor. Employers are being targeted and heavily fined. As this report shows, instead of armed INS raids, single white-collar officials are combing payroll lists for illegals and efficiently terminating their jobs by the hundreds.   But the effectiveness of this approach is devastating whole agricultural communities in which businesses cannot find legal laborers willing to do the hard manual work of picking fruits and vegetables, and immigrants, some of whom have been in the US for many years, can no longer support themselves.
The tragic foolishness of the immigration debate today is that everyone but the extremists and political opportunists appreciates what needs to be done. In a single piece of legislation, effect the following actions in sequence: 1) secure the border with every bit of hardware, fencing and manpower a nativist could want so there is no doubt that the border is indeed tightly defended; 2) provide amnesty and a path to citizenship for all of the otherwise-law-abiding illegal immigrants already in the United States, facing the fact that our loose borders and eager employers have as much as invited them to come; and 3) expand our guest-worker programs so that we have sufficient foreign labor to do the work US citizens will not do, thereby ignoring the complaints of US Labor Unions.   The answers to our immigration problems are not rocket science. Far more complex are the issues that plague the American political system, which cannot even resolve matters like immigration with obvious and widely understood solutions.


15. Jul, 2010 







Author Info
I am disappointed that this article falls into one of the great fallacies of the immigration debate, leading to two of the three recommendations being flawed by the direct dependence those recommendations have on the fallacy.
It is a proven (multiple instances) fallacy that there are large numbers of jobs that legal immigrants and american citizsens won’t do. In every instance of publicized raids of significant numbers of illegal workers, the number of legal applicants for the vacated jobs has FAR exceeded the number of illegal workers removed. If people KNOW the jobs exist and will be offered to legal workers, they apply in overwhelming numbers. If people don’t know, because it’s all done ‘quietly’ by combining payroll lists, then no one knows about the jobs, and many who do may be tired of being rejected as applicants. I myself have a relative who has struggled for years to be employed, being turned down time and time again for jobs that supposedly american citizens won’t do. And this almost as far from the mexican border as is possible in the lower 48.
In a poor economy, the solution in addition to the first recommendation of a truly secure border is to publicly and loudly put the bright spotlight of high profile raids on as many employers of illegals as possible and watch the thousands of legal applicants scramble for the well-publicized jobs. Then ensure safe border crossing points for illegals to freely cross back out of the US and much of the problem will solve itself while at the same time restoring millions of legal workers to the rolls of the employed. Also deny ANY government dollars being allowed to go to illegals and enforce EXISTING FEDERAL laws that actually go beyond Arizona’s state statute.
As for all those illegal workers displaced from jobs, with no government taxpayer funded saftey net and with safe crossing points for leaving and lack of jobs due to the high profile raids, no need for lengthy deportation hearings. Most of them over a period of a few years will have little choice but to leave on their own to survive.
Generally agreed. SECURING THE BORDER is first and foremost. I’m OK with a LONG path to citizenship which prohibits voting rights for a long, long time and would include testing in English and civics (along with all back taxes and FICA and a clean criminal record. (All of this being n/a to anyone who is caught in a raid.)Seasonal guest workers in agriculture are fine.
But- can we PLEASE get off this racial profiling crap???? It’s the border with Mexico! Do you think they are Polish????